Federal practice only

Book a consultation
Criminal Center

Federal charges · Conspiracy

Federal conspiracy charges

A federal conspiracy charge accuses two or more people of agreeing to commit a federal crime or to cheat the United States. The agreement itself is the crime, so the planned crime does not have to happen. The general law, 18 U.S.C. § 371, carries up to 5 years. Other conspiracy laws carry the same penalty as the planned crime.

What is a conspiracy charge?

A criminal conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to break the law. The Supreme Court has said that the essence of a conspiracy is "an agreement to commit an unlawful act," and that the agreement can be punished whether or not the planned crime ever happens (United States v. Jimenez Recio, 537 U.S. 270 (2003)). That makes the federal meaning of conspiracy a crime of its own, separate from the crime the group planned.

The general federal conspiracy law is 18 U.S.C. § 371. It has two parts, often called prongs:

  • Conspiracy to commit an offense. Agreeing to commit any federal crime, such as wire fraud, bribery or a gun offense.
  • Conspiracy to defraud the United States. Agreeing to cheat a federal agency. The Supreme Court has read this to mean mainly cheating the government out of money or property, but also interfering with or obstructing one of its lawful functions "by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest" (Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182 (1924)). No separate crime has to be the goal. Tax cases are a common example.

Under § 371, the government must prove each of these things beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • An agreement. Two or more people agreed to commit a federal crime or to defraud the United States. Prosecutors often try to prove the agreement with circumstantial evidence, such as how people acted together.
  • Knowing and voluntary joining. The person knew what the agreement was about and chose to join it. The government has to prove an agreement, not just presence, family ties or knowledge of the plan.
  • An overt act. At least one member did something to carry out the plan (§ 371). The act can be done by any single member and "need not be itself a crime" (Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49 (1942)).

How do the federal conspiracy laws differ?

Prosecutors choose among several conspiracy laws. The choice changes what must be proved and the maximum sentence.

The four most-charged federal conspiracy laws
LawWhat it coversOvert act needed?Maximum prison
18 U.S.C. § 371Any federal crime, or defrauding the United StatesYes (statute text)5 years (or the misdemeanor maximum if the goal was only a misdemeanor)
18 U.S.C. § 1349Mail, wire, bank, health care, securities and other fraud offenses in chapter 63 of Title 18The text does not mention oneSame as the planned fraud (for example, 20 years for wire fraud)
21 U.S.C. § 846Federal drug crimesNo (Shabani, 1994)Same as the planned drug crime, including any mandatory minimum
18 U.S.C. § 1956(h)Money laundering under §§ 1956 and 1957No (Whitfield, 2005)Same as the planned laundering offense
Sources: 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1349, 1956(h); 21 U.S.C. § 846; United States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10 (1994); Whitfield v. United States, 543 U.S. 209 (2005).

In United States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10 (1994), the Supreme Court held that the drug conspiracy law, 21 U.S.C. § 846, does not require proof of an overt act, because its plain language does not mention one. It reached the same result for money laundering conspiracy under § 1956(h) in Whitfield v. United States, 543 U.S. 209 (2005). The fraud conspiracy law, 18 U.S.C. § 1349, is worded the same way and also does not mention an overt act. The Supreme Court has not decided the § 1349 question directly.

For the details of each one, see fraud conspiracy under § 1349, drug conspiracy under § 846 and money laundering conspiracy. BrandonSample.com also has longer reading on federal fraud conspiracy and federal drug conspiracy.

Can a conspirator be guilty of crimes someone else committed?

Yes, in some cases. Under Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946), a member of a conspiracy can be convicted of a crime another member committed, even without taking part in it. The crime must have been committed in furtherance of the conspiracy and within its scope. The Court said a different case would arise if the crime "could not be reasonably foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement."

This is often called Pinkerton liability. It is one reason a person with a small role can face the same substantive counts as the people at the center of a case.

How does someone withdraw from a conspiracy?

Withdrawal is a defense the person has to prove. In Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 (2013), the Supreme Court unanimously held that the defendant bears the burden of proving withdrawal. Courts generally look for an affirmative step, not just drifting away. In Smith, the jury was told withdrawal meant "affirmative acts inconsistent with the goals of the conspiracy" communicated to the other members "in a manner reasonably calculated to reach those conspirators."

  • What withdrawal does. It ends the person's responsibility for what the others do afterward. The person is still guilty of the conspiracy itself (Smith).
  • Time limits. Most federal conspiracies must be charged within 5 years (18 U.S.C. § 3282). Smith explained that withdrawal combined with a statute-of-limitations defense can end a person's criminal liability, for example where the person withdrew more than 5 years before the indictment.

Can what other members said be used as evidence?

Often, yes. A statement made by a co-conspirator "during and in furtherance of the conspiracy" is not hearsay when it is offered against another member (Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E)). So texts, emails and recorded calls between other members can come in at trial, even if the person charged was not part of the conversation.

Before the statement can be used, the government must show the judge, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the conspiracy existed and that the person was part of it (Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171 (1987)). The judge must consider the statement itself, but it does not by itself establish those facts (Rule 801(d)(2)). That foundation is often contested.

Why are conspiracy charges so common in federal cases?

In fiscal year 2025, according to U.S. Sentencing Commission data, § 371 was a statute of conviction in 1,778 federal cases, § 1349 in 1,610 and § 846 in 7,535. The reasons are practical:

  • The planned crime doesn't have to succeed. The agreement is the crime, so a plan stopped by agents can still be charged (Jimenez Recio).
  • It reaches everyone in the group. People who never touched the money or the drugs can be charged as members.
  • It widens the evidence. Co-conspirator statements can be used against every member, and Pinkerton can make each member answer for others' crimes.
  • It gives prosecutors choices. The same facts can be charged under § 371, with a 5-year cap, or under a statute like § 1349 or § 846 that carries the full penalty. That choice can matter a great deal in plea talks.

Conspiracy is also often charged alongside related crimes such as computer fraud or false statements.

Is conspiracy a felony, and what are the penalties?

  • § 371: up to 5 years and a fine. If the goal was only a misdemeanor, the punishment cannot exceed the maximum for that misdemeanor (18 U.S.C. § 371).
  • Felony class: a 5-year maximum makes a § 371 conspiracy a Class D felony (18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)). A conspiracy whose goal was only a misdemeanor is punished as that misdemeanor.
  • §§ 1349, 846 and 1956(h): the same penalties as the planned crime. A drug conspiracy carries the same mandatory minimums as the drug crime itself (21 U.S.C. § 846).
  • Fine: for an individual, up to $250,000 per felony count, or up to twice the gross gain or twice the gross loss, whichever is greater (18 U.S.C. § 3571(b), (d)).
  • Supervised release: up to 3 years for a § 371 felony (18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)).
  • Separate counts: a conspiracy and the crime it planned are "separate and distinct offenses" (Pinkerton), so a person can be charged with both.

How does sentencing work for this charge?

Appendix A of the Guidelines Manual lists several guidelines for § 371: §2X1.1 for most conspiracies, and specific guidelines for some kinds, such as §2C1.1 for conspiracy to defraud by interfering with government functions, §2T1.9 for tax conspiracies and §2A1.5 for conspiracy to commit murder. Under USSG §2X1.1, the court starts from the guideline for the planned crime, then takes 3 levels off for a conspiracy unless the members had done, or were about to do, everything needed to complete it.

The statutory maximum still caps the sentence. Under § 371 that cap is 5 years per count, whatever the guideline range. For how conspiracy sentences are worked out, see What is the possible sentence for a federal conspiracy charge? at Sentencing.net.

Scheduled change, November 1, 2026. The Sentencing Commission sent Congress amendments on April 30, 2026. Unless Congress acts to change them, they take effect November 1, 2026. They replace the multiple-count rules in Chapter Three, Part D, with a single guideline, §3D1.1, and make matching changes to the §2X1.1 commentary. If the planned crime is a fraud sentenced under §2B1.1, the loss table also rises for inflation. A judge generally uses the manual in effect on the day of sentencing (USSG §1B1.11). (U.S. Sentencing Commission, 2026 amendments)

Pending at the Supreme Court. In Beaird v. United States, No. 25-5343, set for argument on October 13, 2026, the Court agreed to decide whether Stinson v. United States (1993) still states the rule for how much weight courts must give the Guidelines’ commentary, the notes that follow each guideline. The answer could affect rules on this page that come from commentary rather than from the guideline text itself.

Guideline numbers on this page are from the Guidelines Manual in effect since November 1, 2025, which no longer uses “departures”: the judge calculates the range, then weighs the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). For more depth, see What is the possible sentence for a federal conspiracy charge? at Sentencing.net, a Criminal Center site.

Statutes covered on this page

Each federal law this page covers, listed by how often it was a statute of conviction in fiscal year 2025 (U.S. Sentencing Commission data). For each one: the official section heading, what the government must prove, the penalties, and the sentencing guideline the Commission's Statutory Index assigns to it. See all statutes by title and section.

18 U.S.C. § 371: General federal conspiracy

Official heading of 18 U.S.C. § 371: “Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States”

What the government must prove

  • Two or more people agreed to commit a federal crime, or to defraud the United States or one of its agencies.
  • The person knowingly and voluntarily joined the agreement.
  • At least one member committed an overt act to carry out the agreement. Details under What is a conspiracy charge.

Penalties. Up to 5 years and a fine, or no more than the misdemeanor maximum if the goal was only a misdemeanor (§ 371). Fine up to $250,000 or twice the gain or loss (18 U.S.C. § 3571).

Sentencing guideline. Appendix A assigns USSG §2X1.1 (the planned crime's guideline, usually minus 3 levels for an incomplete conspiracy), and §2A1.5, §2C1.1, §2K2.1 or §2T1.9 for certain kinds of conspiracy. Details under Sentencing.

Related conspiracy laws are covered on their own pages: § 1349, 21 U.S.C. § 846 and § 1956(h).

How do these cases usually start and move?

Conspiracy cases are usually built over time with wiretaps, informants, undercover agents, phone and bank records, and messages pulled from seized devices. Many cases have several defendants charged in one indictment.

Co-defendants often plead guilty and agree to testify. Their statements can shape how the government sees everyone else's role, so early review of the discovery matters. For what to do at each stage, see facing federal charges.

Many people first learn they are part of a conspiracy investigation from a target letter or a grand jury subpoena.

The usual stages of a federal case

  1. Investigation. Agents gather records and interview witnesses, often using grand jury subpoenas. Someone the prosecutor views as a "target" may get a target letter before an indictment; a "subject" is anyone whose conduct is within the scope of the grand jury's investigation (Justice Manual 9-11.151, 9-11.153).
  2. Charges. A federal felony is usually charged by indictment: a grand jury decides in private whether there is probable cause (Fed. R. Crim. P. 6, 7). Some cases start with an arrest on a criminal complaint.
  3. First appearance and detention. After an arrest, the person goes before a magistrate judge without unnecessary delay (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5). The judge decides whether they are released or held until trial (18 U.S.C. § 3142).
  4. Evidence and motions. The government must turn over certain evidence (Fed. R. Crim. P. 16). The defense can ask the court to suppress evidence or dismiss charges (Fed. R. Crim. P. 12).
  5. Plea or trial. Many federal cases end in a guilty plea, which the judge must find knowing and voluntary (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11). At trial, the government must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt, and a jury verdict must be unanimous (Fed. R. Crim. P. 31(a)).
  6. Sentencing. A probation officer writes a presentence report, and each side can object in writing within 14 days of receiving it (Fed. R. Crim. P. 32). The judge then decides the sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

More on what to do at each stage: Facing federal charges? What to do now.

What defense issues come up in these cases?

  • Was there an agreement? Working near people who broke the law, buying from them or being related to them is not the same as agreeing with them.
  • Did the person know the goal? The government must show the person knew what the agreement was about and chose to join.
  • One conspiracy or several? If the evidence shows separate groups, the indictment may not match the proof.
  • The overt act. Under § 371, did a member actually take a step to carry out the plan within the time limit?
  • Withdrawal and time limits. Did the person take affirmative steps to leave, and when? Withdrawal more than 5 years before the indictment can matter a great deal.
  • Pinkerton limits. Was a co-conspirator's crime really in furtherance of the agreement, within its scope and reasonably foreseeable?
  • Co-conspirator statements. Did the government lay the foundation Rule 801(d)(2)(E) requires? Are cooperating witnesses believable?
  • Which statute. Was the case charged under § 371 or under a statute with a much higher maximum, and does the proof fit it?

Every case turns on its own facts. These are issues to look at, not predictions about how any case will turn out.

What happens after a conviction?

  • Appeal. A notice of appeal is usually due within 14 days after the judgment is entered (Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)). Many plea agreements waive the right to appeal, but in Hunter v. United States (2026) the Supreme Court held that a waiver can’t be enforced when doing so would cause a miscarriage of justice, a high bar. See how federal criminal appeals work and federal appeals at Sentencing.net.
  • A § 2255 motion. A motion asking the sentencing court to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence, for example for ineffective assistance of counsel. It is usually due within one year after the conviction becomes final (28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)). See 2255motion.com.
  • Compassionate release. A motion asking the judge to reduce a prison sentence for extraordinary and compelling reasons, filed after the person asks the warden and either exhausts BOP appeals or waits 30 days (18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)). It can’t be used to attack the validity of the conviction itself (Fernandez v. United States (2026)). See CompassionateRelease.com.
  • Clemency. The President can pardon a federal offense or commute (shorten) a federal sentence (U.S. Const. art. II, § 2). See Clemency.com.

Common questions

What is a conspiracy charge?

A conspiracy charge accuses two or more people of agreeing to commit a crime. In federal court, the general law is 18 U.S.C. § 371, which covers agreements to commit any federal crime or to defraud the United States, plus an overt act by one member. The agreement is the crime, separate from the planned crime itself.

Is conspiracy a felony?

Usually, yes. A federal conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 carries up to 5 years, which makes it a Class D felony (18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)). If the goal was only a misdemeanor, the punishment cannot exceed that misdemeanor's maximum. Drug, fraud and money laundering conspiracies carry the same penalties as the planned crime.

Can you be charged with conspiracy if the crime never happened?

Yes. The agreement itself is the crime. The Supreme Court has said a conspiracy can be punished whether or not the planned crime ever happens, and that a conspiracy does not end just because agents made its goal impossible (United States v. Jimenez Recio, 2003). Under 18 U.S.C. § 371, one member must still have taken an overt act.

What is the difference between 18 U.S.C. 371 and 1349?

Section 371 covers an agreement to commit any federal crime or to defraud the United States, requires an overt act and carries up to 5 years. Section 1349 covers agreements to commit mail, wire, bank, health care or securities fraud, does not mention an overt act, and carries the same penalty as the planned fraud, for example up to 20 years for wire fraud.

Sources

Law checked against these sources on . This page is general information about federal law, not legal advice for any case.

Book a consultation

Not sure which court has the case? Find the federal court.

Federal only

What should I do next?

Book a consultation with Criminal Center and tell us what happened. We'll listen, tell you whether we can help, and explain what comes next.

Contact does not create an attorney-client relationship. Unsolicited information may not be confidential.

Book a consultation