Federal practice only

Book a consultation
Criminal Center

Federal charges · Corruption and crimes against justice

Federal perjury and false statements

This page covers federal perjury and false statements. Perjury means willfully lying under oath about something material, and in federal law it is a felony punishable by up to 5 years in prison (18 U.S.C. §§ 1621, 1623). Lying to a federal agent or agency, even without an oath, can be a separate 5-year felony under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.

What does perjury mean in federal law?

Perjury is lying under oath. Federal law has two main perjury statutes. They overlap, but they are not the same.

Perjury generally (18 U.S.C. § 1621)

Section 1621 covers anyone who takes an oath in a case where federal law allows one, and then "willfully and contrary to such oath" states a material matter they do not believe is true. It also covers a written declaration signed "under penalty of perjury" under 28 U.S.C. § 1746, such as many federal forms and court filings. It applies whether the statement was made inside or outside the United States.

False declarations in court or before a grand jury (18 U.S.C. § 1623)

Section 1623 covers knowingly making a false material declaration under oath in a proceeding before or ancillary to a federal court or grand jury, such as testimony at trial, at a deposition or before a grand jury. It differs from § 1621 in ways that matter:

  • Knowingly, not willfully. Section 1623 requires that the person knew the declaration was false.
  • Contradictory statements. If a person made two sworn statements so inconsistent that one must be false, the government does not have to prove which one was false (§ 1623(c)). It is a defense that the person believed each statement was true when made.
  • No two-witness rule. Section 1623(e) says proof beyond a reasonable doubt is enough and no particular number of witnesses is needed.
  • Recantation. Admitting the falsehood in the same proceeding can bar prosecution in some cases (§ 1623(d)), discussed below.

Getting someone else to lie under oath is subornation of perjury, which also carries up to 5 years (18 U.S.C. § 1622).

Is lying to the FBI or another federal agency a crime?

Yes. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 makes it a crime, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the federal executive, legislative or judicial branch, to knowingly and willfully:

  • falsify, conceal or cover up a material fact by any trick, scheme or device;
  • make a materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation; or
  • make or use a false writing or document, knowing it contains a materially false statement.

No oath is needed. Section 1001 covers spoken answers in an interview with FBI or other federal agents, as well as forms, applications and reports filed with federal agencies.

A simple denial can be enough

Some courts used to recognize an "exculpatory no" exception for a person who simply denied wrongdoing to agents. The Supreme Court rejected that exception in Brogan v. United States, 522 U.S. 398 (1998). It held that § 1001 covers "any" false statement, including a plain "no." The Court added that the Fifth Amendment does not confer a privilege to lie. It protects the right to remain silent, which is a different thing.

Limits on § 1001

  • Statements by parties to a judge. Section 1001 does not apply to a party to a court case, or the party's lawyer, for statements or papers submitted to the judge in that case (§ 1001(b)). Perjury laws can still apply to sworn statements.
  • Congress. For matters before Congress, § 1001 reaches only certain administrative matters and authorized investigations or reviews (§ 1001(c)).
  • Willfulness and materiality. The government must prove the statement was false, that the person knew it and acted willfully, and that it was material.

For what to do when agents ask for an interview or a target letter arrives, see our guides to federal investigations and target letters.

What makes a false statement material?

Every one of these crimes requires a material falsehood. In United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506 (1995), a § 1001 case, the parties agreed that a material statement is one with "a natural tendency to influence, or [be] capable of influencing, the decision of the decisionmaking body to which it was addressed." The Supreme Court held that materiality is for the jury to decide at trial, not the judge, because it is an element of the crime.

Because the test asks whether a statement was capable of influencing the decision, the government does not have to show that anyone was actually fooled.

What defenses are specific to perjury?

Literal truth

In Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973), the Supreme Court held that § 1621 does not reach an answer that is literally true but unresponsive, even if the witness meant to mislead. The Court said the fix for a misleading but true answer is careful follow-up questioning, not a perjury prosecution.

Recantation under § 1623(d)

If, in the same continuing court or grand jury proceeding, a person admits a declaration was false, that admission bars a § 1623 prosecution, as long as when the admission is made the false declaration has not substantially affected the proceeding, or it has not become manifest that the falsity has been or will be exposed (18 U.S.C. § 1623(d)). Timing is everything. The defense does not apply to § 1621 charges.

The two-witness rule

For perjury under § 1621, the government must prove the statement was false with the testimony of two independent witnesses, or one witness plus corroborating evidence (Weiler v. United States, 323 U.S. 606 (1945), decided under the general perjury statute that § 1621 carries forward). Congress removed that rule for § 1623 cases (§ 1623(e)).

When is falsifying or destroying records a federal crime?

Two obstruction laws reach false or destroyed records. Both carry up to 20 years, four times the maximum for a § 1001 false statement.

Falsifying records in a federal investigation (18 U.S.C. § 1519)

Section 1519 punishes knowingly altering, destroying, concealing or falsifying a record, document or tangible object, or making a false entry in one, with intent to impede, obstruct or influence a federal investigation or a bankruptcy case, or in relation to or contemplation of one.

In Abouammo v. United States, 608 U.S. 597 (2026), a unanimous Supreme Court held that a person charged under § 1519 must be tried where the falsification happened, not where the investigation was based. The only prohibited act in § 1519 is the falsification, and the intent element does not create venue. Abouammo made the false document in Seattle, so trying him in Northern California was improper. The decision is about § 1519. Its reasoning may matter for similar statutes. See our news post on Abouammo.

Destroying evidence for an official proceeding (18 U.S.C. § 1512(c))

Section 1512(c) punishes corruptly altering, destroying, mutilating or concealing a record, document or other object to impair its availability for an official proceeding, or otherwise obstructing, influencing or impeding an official proceeding. In Fischer v. United States, 603 U.S. 480 (2024), the Supreme Court read the second part narrowly. To prove a violation of § 1512(c)(2), the government must establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity, for use in an official proceeding, of records, documents, objects or other things used in an official proceeding, or attempted to do so. Subsection (c)(2) is read in light of (c)(1). It is not a catch-all for every form of obstruction.

Is perjury a felony, and what is the punishment in federal court?

Yes. Federal perjury and false statements are felonies, because they carry more than one year in prison (18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)).

Maximum prison terms
LawMaximum
18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false statements)5 years; 8 years if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism, or the matter relates to certain federal sex offenses
18 U.S.C. § 1621 (perjury)5 years
18 U.S.C. § 1622 (subornation of perjury)5 years
18 U.S.C. § 1623 (false declarations in court or before a grand jury)5 years; 10 years if before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or its Court of Review
18 U.S.C. § 1519 (falsifying records)20 years
18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) (destroying evidence; obstructing an official proceeding)20 years
The 8-year § 1001 maximum covers matters relating to chapters 109A (sexual abuse), 109B (sex offender registration), 110 (sexual exploitation of children) and 117 (transportation for illegal sexual activity) of Title 18, and 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (sex trafficking).
  • Mandatory minimum: none.
  • Fine: for an individual, up to $250,000 per felony count, or up to twice the gross gain or twice the gross loss, whichever is greater (18 U.S.C. § 3571(b), (d)).
  • Supervised release: up to 3 years for these felonies (18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)).
  • Time limit: generally 5 years from the offense (18 U.S.C. § 3282).
  • Collateral effects: a felony conviction can affect gun rights, professional licenses and immigration status.

How does sentencing work for these charges?

The judge first works out the range under the Sentencing Guidelines, then weighs the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The Commission's Statutory Index (Appendix A) assigns these guidelines:

  • § 1001: USSG §2B1.1 (base level 6, plus any loss), or §2J1.2 when the 8-year maximum applies. Under §2B1.1(c)(3), if the conduct in the count of conviction makes out an offense covered specifically by another Chapter Two guideline, the court applies that guideline instead.
  • §§ 1621, 1622 and 1623: USSG §2J1.3, base level 14. Levels are added if the perjury resulted in substantial interference with the administration of justice. If the perjury was about a criminal offense, a cross reference to §2X3.1 (accessory after the fact) can produce a higher level tied to that offense.
  • §§ 1519 and 1512(c): USSG §2J1.2, base level 14, with increases for substantial interference with the administration of justice and for destroying or altering a substantial number of records or especially probative records, and the same §2X3.1 cross reference.

Scheduled change, November 1, 2026. The Sentencing Commission sent Congress amendments on April 30, 2026. Unless Congress acts to change them, they take effect November 1, 2026. They replace the multiple-count rules in Chapter Three, Part D, with a single guideline, §3D1.1, rewrite §2J1.3's special instruction for perjury counts from separate proceedings to match, and make other changes to §2J1.3. The §2B1.1 loss table, which can apply to a § 1001 conviction, also rises for inflation. A judge generally uses the manual in effect on the day of sentencing (USSG §1B1.11). (U.S. Sentencing Commission, 2026 amendments)

Pending at the Supreme Court. In Beaird v. United States, No. 25-5343, set for argument on October 13, 2026, the Court agreed to decide whether Stinson v. United States (1993) still states the rule for how much weight courts must give the Guidelines’ commentary, the notes that follow each guideline. The answer could affect rules on this page that come from commentary rather than from the guideline text itself.

Guideline numbers on this page are from the Guidelines Manual in effect since November 1, 2025, which no longer uses “departures”: the judge calculates the range, then weighs the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). For more depth, see How the federal Sentencing Guidelines work, at Sentencing.net, a Criminal Center site.

Statutes covered on this page

Each federal law this page covers, listed by how often it was a statute of conviction in fiscal year 2025 (U.S. Sentencing Commission data). For each one: the official section heading, what the government must prove, the penalties, and the sentencing guideline the Commission's Statutory Index assigns to it. See all statutes by title and section.

18 U.S.C. § 1001: False statements to the federal government

Official heading of 18 U.S.C. § 1001: “Statements or entries generally”

What the government must prove

Penalties. Up to 5 years, or up to 8 years if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism or the matter relates to certain federal sex offenses (§ 1001(a)). Fine up to $250,000 or twice the gain or loss (18 U.S.C. § 3571).

Sentencing guideline. Appendix A assigns USSG §2B1.1, and §2J1.2 when the 8-year maximum applies. Details under Sentencing.

18 U.S.C. § 1512(c): Destroying evidence or obstructing an official proceeding

Official heading of 18 U.S.C. § 1512: “Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant”

What the government must prove

  • (c)(1): the person corruptly altered, destroyed, mutilated or concealed a record, document or other object, or tried to, with intent to impair its integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding.
  • (c)(2): the person corruptly obstructed, influenced or impeded an official proceeding, or tried to. After Fischer v. United States (2024), the government must show the person impaired, or tried to impair, the availability or integrity of records, documents, objects or other things used in an official proceeding.

Penalties. Up to 20 years and a fine (§ 1512(c)).

Sentencing guideline. Appendix A assigns USSG §2J1.2 (base level 14).

18 U.S.C. § 1519: Falsifying or destroying records in a federal investigation

Official heading of 18 U.S.C. § 1519: “Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy”

What the government must prove

  • The person knowingly altered, destroyed, mutilated, concealed, covered up or falsified a record, document or tangible object, or made a false entry in one.
  • The person intended to impede, obstruct or influence the investigation or proper administration of a matter within a federal agency's jurisdiction or a bankruptcy case, or acted in relation to or contemplation of one.
  • Venue: the case must be tried where the falsification happened (Abouammo v. United States (2026)).

Penalties. Up to 20 years and a fine (§ 1519).

Sentencing guideline. Appendix A assigns USSG §2J1.2 (base level 14).

18 U.S.C. § 1623: False declarations in court or before a grand jury

Official heading of 18 U.S.C. § 1623: “False declarations before grand jury or court”

What the government must prove

  • The person was under oath (or made a declaration under penalty of perjury) in a proceeding before or ancillary to a federal court or grand jury.
  • The person knowingly made a false declaration, or used a document or other material knowing it contained one.
  • The declaration was material.

Penalties. Up to 5 years, or 10 years if the proceeding was before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or its Court of Review (§ 1623(a)). A timely recantation in the same proceeding can bar prosecution (§ 1623(d)).

Sentencing guideline. Appendix A assigns USSG §2J1.3 (base level 14).

18 U.S.C. § 1621: Perjury

Official heading of 18 U.S.C. § 1621: “Perjury generally”

What the government must prove

  • The person took an oath before a competent tribunal, officer or person, in a case where federal law authorizes an oath, or signed a declaration under penalty of perjury under 28 U.S.C. § 1746.
  • The person willfully stated or subscribed to a material matter they did not believe to be true.
  • Falsity must be shown by two witnesses, or one witness plus corroboration (Weiler v. United States (1945)). A literally true answer is not perjury (Bronston v. United States (1973)).

Penalties. Up to 5 years and a fine (§ 1621).

Sentencing guideline. Appendix A assigns USSG §2J1.3 (base level 14).

How do these cases usually start and move?

False statement charges often grow out of an investigation into something else. Agents interview a person, compare the answers with records and other witnesses, and charge § 1001 when the answers don't match. Sometimes the false statement charge is the only one brought. Perjury charges usually follow grand jury or trial testimony, when the transcript can be compared with other evidence.

The most important point comes before any of this: you do not have to answer agents' questions, and talking with a lawyer before an interview or grand jury appearance is the safer course. A person can be both a witness in someone else's case and a subject of their own. For what to do at each stage, see facing federal charges. False statement and obstruction counts are often charged together with conspiracy, and with misprision of a felony when someone helped hide another person's crime.

For more on the stage before charges, see our guides to federal investigations and the federal grand jury.

The usual stages of a federal case

  1. Investigation. Agents gather records and interview witnesses, often using grand jury subpoenas. Someone the prosecutor views as a "target" may get a target letter before an indictment; a "subject" is anyone whose conduct is within the scope of the grand jury's investigation (Justice Manual 9-11.151, 9-11.153).
  2. Charges. A federal felony is usually charged by indictment: a grand jury decides in private whether there is probable cause (Fed. R. Crim. P. 6, 7). Some cases start with an arrest on a criminal complaint.
  3. First appearance and detention. After an arrest, the person goes before a magistrate judge without unnecessary delay (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5). The judge decides whether they are released or held until trial (18 U.S.C. § 3142).
  4. Evidence and motions. The government must turn over certain evidence (Fed. R. Crim. P. 16). The defense can ask the court to suppress evidence or dismiss charges (Fed. R. Crim. P. 12).
  5. Plea or trial. Many federal cases end in a guilty plea, which the judge must find knowing and voluntary (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11). At trial, the government must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt, and a jury verdict must be unanimous (Fed. R. Crim. P. 31(a)).
  6. Sentencing. A probation officer writes a presentence report, and each side can object in writing within 14 days of receiving it (Fed. R. Crim. P. 32). The judge then decides the sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

More on what to do at each stage: Facing federal charges? What to do now.

What defense issues come up in these cases?

  • Was the statement false? Many cases turn on what the question meant and what the answer meant. An ambiguous question can make it hard to prove the answer was false.
  • Literal truth. Under Bronston, a literally true but misleading answer is not perjury under § 1621.
  • Knowledge and willfulness. Was it a lie, or a faulty memory, a misunderstanding or a guess?
  • Materiality. Was the statement capable of influencing the decision of the agency, court or grand jury? The jury decides (Gaudin).
  • Recantation and the two-witness rule. Was there a timely correction under § 1623(d)? In a § 1621 case, does the proof meet the two-witness rule?
  • Fischer and Abouammo. For § 1512(c)(2), did the conduct involve impairing records or other evidence? For § 1519, was the case brought where the falsification happened?
  • The recording and the notes. Was the interview recorded? If not, how reliable are the agents' notes and reports of what was said?

Every case turns on its own facts. These are issues to look at, not predictions about how any case will turn out.

What happens after a conviction?

  • Appeal. A notice of appeal is usually due within 14 days after the judgment is entered (Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)). Many plea agreements waive the right to appeal, but in Hunter v. United States (2026) the Supreme Court held that a waiver can’t be enforced when doing so would cause a miscarriage of justice, a high bar. See how federal criminal appeals work and federal appeals at Sentencing.net.
  • A § 2255 motion. A motion asking the sentencing court to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence, for example for ineffective assistance of counsel. It is usually due within one year after the conviction becomes final (28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)). See 2255motion.com.
  • Compassionate release. A motion asking the judge to reduce a prison sentence for extraordinary and compelling reasons, filed after the person asks the warden and either exhausts BOP appeals or waits 30 days (18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)). It can’t be used to attack the validity of the conviction itself (Fernandez v. United States (2026)). See CompassionateRelease.com.
  • Clemency. The President can pardon a federal offense or commute (shorten) a federal sentence (U.S. Const. art. II, § 2). See Clemency.com.

Common questions

What does perjury mean?

Perjury means lying under oath about something material. Under federal law, it is willfully stating something you do not believe is true after taking an oath, or in a statement signed under penalty of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621). Knowingly making a false material statement under oath in federal court or before a federal grand jury is also covered by 18 U.S.C. § 1623.

Is perjury a felony?

Yes, in federal court. Perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 and false declarations under 18 U.S.C. § 1623 each carry up to 5 years in prison, which makes them felonies (18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)). State perjury laws are separate and are not covered here.

What is the punishment for perjury in federal court?

Up to 5 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 per count (18 U.S.C. §§ 1621, 1623, 3571). A § 1623 case before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court carries up to 10 years. There is no mandatory minimum. The Sentencing Guidelines start perjury at offense level 14 under USSG §2J1.3.

What is 18 U.S.C. 1001?

It is the main federal false statements law. It makes it a crime to knowingly and willfully make a materially false statement, use a false document, or hide a material fact by a trick or scheme in any matter within the jurisdiction of the federal government. It carries up to 5 years, or 8 years in some terrorism and sex offense matters.

Is lying to the FBI a crime?

Yes. A knowing and willful false statement to FBI agents about a material fact can be charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, even if the person was not under oath. In Brogan v. United States (1998), the Supreme Court held that even a simple false denial counts. Declining to answer is different: the Fifth Amendment protects silence, not false statements.

Sources

Law checked against these sources on . This page is general information about federal law, not legal advice for any case.

Book a consultation

Not sure which court has the case? Find the federal court.

Federal only

What should I do next?

Book a consultation with Criminal Center and tell us what happened. We'll listen, tell you whether we can help, and explain what comes next.

Contact does not create an attorney-client relationship. Unsolicited information may not be confidential.

Book a consultation